Understanding comes first, then awareness, then some feeling for the people at the other end of the supply chain. A game lets someone make the trade-off themselves and watch what it costs, which a compliance module has never managed.
Not a criticism of the people taking it. Box-ticking is what the format rewards.
Browser-based, no installs, SCORM-compatible if your LMS needs it. Different games reach different people, which is the reason there are three rather than one.
Post-apocalyptic survival in a world already damaged by eWaste pollution. Players scavenge, survive, and rebuild, which turns material scarcity from an abstraction into the thing standing between them and the next day. Survival framing reaches people that policy framing does not.
A strategy game about climate activism. Players organise, choose targets, and live with the consequences of their choices. It builds the empathy half of the problem: understanding why people push, and what it costs them when nothing moves.
The straightforward one. eWaste collection and recycling taught directly, customisable per organisation, so staff learn WEEE obligations by doing the classification rather than reading about it. This is the version auditors care about.
Deploy a link. There is no install, no plugin, and no IT ticket.
Describe your team and what they need to understand. You get a recommendation on which game, what format, and how to measure whether it worked.